Due to a small wash at the south end of the property, the guardians of the citizenry’s collective life and limb ignored Staff recommendations and an Engineer’s sealed findings to deny the plan amendment on questionable grounds.
Please: was the use appropriate? or not? Of course it was.
If so, vote for it and let your engineering and planning staff work out the hydrology.
What does Council know about flooding? And why do you have an engineering staff if you know more than they do? Again: was the use appropriate for that site, or not? Of course it was.